Flag: Tornado! Hurricane!


Created: Tuesday, January 22 2008 04:06.26 CST Modified: Wednesday, January 23 2008 02:21.41 CST
Printer Friendly ...
ExcpHook 0.0.4 released
Author: GynvaelColdwind # Views: 3443

Hi,

I've made a couple of bug fixes on the ExcpHook, changed the version string, and here it is.

The last public version was 0.0.3, this is what has changed from that version:

0.0.3b -> 0.0.4
  * Reformated the driver code a little
  * Fixed BSoD on race condition when multiple threads tried to add
    an exception at the same time and the list was full
  * Fixed the driver sending not fully filled data to the app when
    the read request was handled at the same time as adding driver info
  * Resized the exception buffer to 128 exceptions
  * Added a new stress test to the Test Suite

0.0.3a -> 0.0.3b
  * ExcpHook.exe now searches for the driver in current directory and in the
    directory where the exe file is placed.

0.0.3 -> 0.0.3a
  * Changed KiDispatchException signature to be more generic (thx goes to
    Frank Boldewin)


The 0.0.4 version can be downloaded from this site.

Any comments are welcomed (bug reports / feature requests / anything).

I'll focus on implementing new features in the 0.0.5 version.

Well, that's it ;>
G.C.


Blog Comments
frankboldewin Posted: Wednesday, January 23 2008 00:18.19 CST
thanx for sharing.

really looking forward to the verbose output feature, like
disasm/hex-bytes combination snippets of the exception area. ;)

GynvaelColdwind Posted: Wednesday, January 23 2008 00:57.45 CST
thx for taking time to comment ;>

I'll try to add the disasm/hex-bytes features, as well as registry and stack display, in 0.0.5 version.

Oh, there is a typo there.. its 0.0.4 and not 4.0.0 ;>

djnemo Posted: Friday, January 25 2008 10:31.44 CST
thanks again dear GynvaelColdwind but i think when it's with source ,it's better to have some comment in source

GynvaelColdwind Posted: Friday, January 25 2008 13:05.58 CST
@djnemo
There are 'some' comments ;>
Hehe but of course You are correct sir ;> I'm adding 'add many comments' to the todo list ;>

frankboldewin Posted: Friday, January 25 2008 17:09.02 CST
confusius says:

well written code does not need comments. :D

GynvaelColdwind Posted: Saturday, January 26 2008 01:57.31 CST
@frankboldewin
Wasn't that Oscar Wilde ? ;>>>
Anyway, as u know currently the code of ExcpHook is far from 'well written' ;>>



Add New Comment
Comment:









There are 21,677 total registered users.


Recently Created Topics
PyEmu error when cal...
Sep/02
Restore Themida/Winl...
Sep/02
Anti-olly technique
Aug/30
RAR Password
Aug/29
Heap protection on W...
Aug/23
Why Inline asm in C+...
Aug/20
Bypassing OllyAdvance
Aug/17
Error in logic for g...
Aug/17
Has anyone seen this...
Aug/17
ARM Executable - Pat...
Aug/16


Recent Forum Posts
reverse engineering ...
raiden56
pydbg, memory breakp...
Researc...
RAR Password
Ineedhelp
RAR Password
cod
Heap protection on W...
voila
Heap protection on W...
j00ru
Heap protection on W...
voila
Heap protection on W...
j00ru
Heap protection on W...
psylocn
Why Inline asm in C+...
ronnie2...


Recent Blog Entries
meshmesh
Sep/01
Is it legal??

waleedassar
Aug/30
Anti-olly technique

QvasiModo
Aug/24
WinAppDbg 1.4 is out!

artemblagodarenko
Aug/18
Dataflow-0.2.0 released. Ne...

grzonu
Aug/17
Bypassing OllyAdvanced

More ...


Recent Blog Comments
tosanjay on:
Sep/02
PyEmu 0.0.2

GynvaelColdwind on:
Sep/01
Is it legal??

PeterFerrie on:
Aug/31
Anti-olly technique

dennis on:
Aug/26
Dr. Gadget IDAPython plugin

halsten on:
Aug/19
Dataflow-0.2.0 released. Ne...

More ...


Imagery
SoySauce Blueprint
Jun 6, 2008

[+] expand

View Gallery (11) / Submit