<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>OpenRCE: Blog</title>
        <link>http://www.openrce.org/rss/feeds/blog</link>
        <description>OpenRCE: The Open Reverse Code Engineering Community</description>
                <item>
            <title>The site logo</title>
                            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:01:44 -0500</pubDate>
                                        <link>https://www.openrce.org/blog/view/32/The_site_logo</link>
                                        <author>2GooD &lt;email-suppressed@example.com&gt;</author>
                                                    <description>I like it a lot! Nice!</description>
                    </item>
                <item>
            <title>ARM improvements in Desquirr</title>
                            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 03:42:54 -0500</pubDate>
                                        <link>https://www.openrce.org/blog/view/18/ARM_improvements_in_Desquirr</link>
                                        <author>2GooD &lt;email-suppressed@example.com&gt;</author>
                                                    <description>Willem Hengeveld recently joined the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sourceforge.net/projects/desquirr/&quot;&gt;Desquirr SourceForge project&lt;/a&gt;. He has continued Job de Haas' work on improving the ARM support in Desquirr. Give the CVS version a try if you dare! :-)</description>
                    </item>
                <item>
            <title>Decompilation thoughts 1</title>
                            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 03:35:50 -0500</pubDate>
                                        <link>https://www.openrce.org/blog/view/8/Decompilation_thoughts_1</link>
                                        <author>2GooD &lt;email-suppressed@example.com&gt;</author>
                                                    <description>It would have been really cool to start working on an improved version of Desquirr. I mean, it is three years old by now. Over a year ago I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.2good.nu/?id=260&quot;&gt;documented some ideas&lt;/a&gt; but that's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, Boomerang rocks the decompilation world and the authors are the real pros so in part it feels pointless to work on Desquirr. It would probably be more worthwhile to make a Boomerang frontend that takes input from IDA Pro. Maybe Ero Carrera's REML could be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also about decompilation, check out point 7 in Pierre Vandevenne's post &amp;quot;global philosophy overview&amp;quot; on the IDA Pro board if you haven't already :&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.datarescue.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?/topic/4/311.html#000000&quot;&gt;http://www.datarescue.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?/topic/4/311.html#000000&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\David</description>
                    </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
