ExcpHook 0.0.4 released
 Gynvael Coldwind (GynvaelColdwind) <gynvael vexillium org> |
Tuesday, January 22 2008 04:06.26 CST |
Hi,
I've made a couple of bug fixes on the ExcpHook, changed the version string, and here it is.
The last public version was 0.0.3, this is what has changed from that version:
0.0.3b -> 0.0.4
* Reformated the driver code a little
* Fixed BSoD on race condition when multiple threads tried to add
an exception at the same time and the list was full
* Fixed the driver sending not fully filled data to the app when
the read request was handled at the same time as adding driver info
* Resized the exception buffer to 128 exceptions
* Added a new stress test to the Test Suite
0.0.3a -> 0.0.3b
* ExcpHook.exe now searches for the driver in current directory and in the
directory where the exe file is placed.
0.0.3 -> 0.0.3a
* Changed KiDispatchException signature to be more generic (thx goes to
Frank Boldewin)
The 0.0.4 version can be downloaded from this site.
Any comments are welcomed (bug reports / feature requests / anything).
I'll focus on implementing new features in the 0.0.5 version.
Well, that's it ;>
G.C.
Comments
 frankboldewin |
Posted: Wednesday, January 23 2008 00:18.19 CST |
|
thanx for sharing. really looking forward to the verbose output feature, like disasm/hex-bytes combination snippets of the exception area. ;) |
|
 GynvaelColdwind |
Posted: Wednesday, January 23 2008 00:57.45 CST |
|
thx for taking time to comment ;> I'll try to add the disasm/hex-bytes features, as well as registry and stack display, in 0.0.5 version. Oh, there is a typo there.. its 0.0.4 and not 4.0.0 ;> |
|
 djnemo |
Posted: Friday, January 25 2008 10:31.44 CST |
| thanks again dear GynvaelColdwind but i think when it's with source ,it's better to have some comment in source | |
|
GynvaelColdwind |
Posted: Friday, January 25 2008 13:05.58 CST |
|
@djnemo There are 'some' comments ;> Hehe but of course You are correct sir ;> I'm adding 'add many comments' to the todo list ;> |
|
|
frankboldewin |
Posted: Friday, January 25 2008 17:09.02 CST |
|
confusius says: well written code does not need comments. :D |
|
|
GynvaelColdwind |
Posted: Saturday, January 26 2008 01:57.31 CST |
|
@frankboldewin Wasn't that Oscar Wilde ? ;>>> Anyway, as u know currently the code of ExcpHook is far from 'well written' ;>> |
|