📚 OpenRCE is preserved as a read-only archive. Launched at RECon Montreal in 2005. Registration and posting are disabled.








Flag: Tornado! Hurricane!

 Forums >>  Brainstorms - General  >>  Virtual Server

Topic created on: July 19, 2007 03:44 CDT by NIM .

Vista was slower than it should be under virtualization, almost as if something - a poorly written kernel driver or bug in the scheduler - was dragging the OS down during benchmark testing.

Since my original tests were isolated to virtual machines running atop a Windows Host OS (Vista 64-bit), I decided to shake things up a bit and repeat the scenarios using VMware Workstation 6.0 running on Ubuntu 7.04 "Feisty Fawn." The results only served to deepen the mystery.

As with Vista under Windows-based VMware, the Vista-on-Ubuntu VM was slower than it should have been. But whereas the former configuration was as much as 50% slower than its equivalent native performance delta � as measured between Windows XP and Vista on bare hardware � indicated it should be, the Vista-on-Ubuntu scenario showed a 93% slower result. In other words, if the delta between XP and Vista running natively is ~2x, and the delta for the same OS configurations under Windows-hosted virtualization is ~2.5x, then the delta under Ubuntu is ~3x.

All things being equal, the deltas between these test scenarios � non-virtualized Windows XP vs. Vista on hardware, virtualized XP vs. virtualized Vista on Windows, and virtualized XP vs. virtualized Vista on Ubuntu � should be identical. However, in each case some mitigating factor is causing Vista to run more slowly, as measured by the completion times for the OfficeBench test script, than I would have expected it to give my experience benchmarking the OS natively. And this factor seems to have an even greater impact when running atop a Linux-derived Host OS.

Frankly, this is the opposite of what I expected when I set out to repeat the tests under "Feisty." I figured that the lower overall footprint of Linux � i.e. the whole �runs well on older systems with limited RAM� claim � would have contributed to a better showing across the board. In fact, the opposite now seems to be the case:

When it comes to the performance of virtualized Windows XP and Vista, Microsoft's newest OS mops the floor with Linux...or at least with the Ubuntu distribution of Debian. Go figure!

=======================================
IL N'EST DE BONHEUR QUE DANS LES VOIES COMMUNES!

  AnonymoUS     July 20, 2007 00:31.30 CDT
Plagiarized:  http://weblog.infoworld.com/enterprisedesktop/archives/2007/07/virtualized_vis.html

Note: Registration is required to post to the forums.

There are 31,328 total registered users.


Recently Created Topics
[help] Unpacking VMP...
Mar/12
Reverse Engineering ...
Jul/06
let 'IDAPython' impo...
Sep/24
set 'IDAPython' as t...
Sep/24
GuessType return une...
Sep/20
About retrieving the...
Sep/07
How to find specific...
Aug/15
How to get data depe...
Jul/07
Identify RVA data in...
May/06
Question about memor...
Dec/12


Recent Forum Posts
Finding the procedur...
rolEYder
Question about debbu...
rolEYder
Identify RVA data in...
sohlow
let 'IDAPython' impo...
sohlow
How to find specific...
hackgreti
Problem with ollydbg
sh3dow
How can I write olly...
sh3dow
New LoadMAP plugin v...
mefisto...
Intel pin in loaded ...
djnemo
OOP_RE tool available?
Bl4ckm4n


Recent Blog Entries
halsten
Mar/14
Breaking IonCUBE VM

oleavr
Oct/24
Anatomy of a code tracer

hasherezade
Sep/24
IAT Patcher - new tool for ...

oleavr
Aug/27
CryptoShark: code tracer ba...

oleavr
Jun/25
Build a debugger in 5 minutes

More ...


Recent Blog Comments
nieo on:
Mar/22
IAT Patcher - new tool for ...

djnemo on:
Nov/17
Kernel debugger vs user mod...

acel on:
Nov/14
Kernel debugger vs user mod...

pedram on:
Dec/21
frida.github.io: scriptable...

capadleman on:
Jun/19
Using NtCreateThreadEx for ...

More ...


Imagery
SoySauce Blueprint
Jun 6, 2008

[+] expand

View Gallery (11) / Submit